1.   COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX  VS. DELHI RACE CLUB LTD, ITA NO. 128/2008, DATE OF ORDER : 03.03.2011, HIGH COURT OF DELHI

CBDT Circular on monetary limits for filing appeals applies to pending appeals

The Department filed an appeal in the year 2008 where the tax effect was less than Rs. 10 lakhs. The question arose whether in view of Instruction No. 3/2011 Dated 9-2-2011 the appeal was maintainable. HELD dismissing the appeal: 

In view of CIT vs. P. S. Jain & Co (included in file) which followed Pithwa Engineering 276 ITR 519 (Bom) & Ashok Patel 317 ITR 386 (MP) and where it was held that the CBDT Circular imposing limits on the filing of appeals by the department applied to pending appeals, Instruction No. 3/2011 Dated 9-2-2011 also applied to pending appeals and as the tax effect was less than Rs. 10 lakhs, the appeal was not maintainable.

(Please click here for judgment)

   

2.   ABN AMRO BANK, N.V. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I.T.A. NO. 458 OF 2005, CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Interest paid by a branch of a Foreign Bank to its HO is deductible in the hands of the branch. Such interest is not taxable in the HO’s hands 

The assessee, a Netherlands Bank, carried on banking business through a PE in India. The PE borrowed funds from its HO on which interest was paid. The assessee claimed that in the computation of profits of the PE under Article 7(3)(b) of the India-Netherlands DTAA, the interest paid to the HO was deductible. The AO & CIT (A) held that while the interest was deductible in principle in the hands of the PE, it was taxable in the hands of the HO and as there was no TDS u/s 195, the interest had to be disallowed u/s 40(a)(i). The result was that the interest paid by the PE to the HO was disallowed in the hands of the PE while being assessed in the hands of the HO. On appeal, the Special Bench (98 TTJ Kol 295) held that the PE and the HO were the same person and the interest paid was neither deductible in the hands of the PE nor assessable in the hands of the HO. On appeal by the assessee, HELD reversing the Special Bench: 

(i) As regards deductibility of the interest in the hands of the PE, though a branch and the HO are the “same person” in general law, Articles 5 & 7 of the DTAA provide that the PE shall be assessable as a separate entity. Under Article 7(3)(b) payment of interest by a bank’s PE to its HO is allowed as a deduction. The result is that the interest paid by the PE to the HO is deductible in computing the PE’s profits (Betts Hartley Huett 116 ITR 425 (Cal) distinguished); 

(ii) As regards taxability in the hands of the HO & obligation for TDS u/s 195, in accordance with the principles of apportionment of profits between the PE & the HO as laid down in Hyundai Heavy Industries 291 ITR 482 (SC) & Morgan Stanley 162 TM 165 (SC), only the PE is to be taken as the assessee and not the HO. As the interest was not chargeable to tax in the hands of the HO, the PE was under no obligation to deduct tax u/s 195 and consequently no disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) can be made in the hands of the branch.

(Please click here for judgment) 

   

3.   [Contribution by  CA. Rakesh Choudhary, and contributor is available on Mobile No.  9868500351 / email-id: rakeshchoudhary1@indiatimes.com ]

A Synopsis - BANK AUDIT and IFRS

(Please click here for synopsis)

  

What's New

• CBDT PRESS RELEASE - Scrutiny of returns of senior citizens and small taxpayers- CBDT revises procedure to grant relief  (Click here)

• Central Excise Circular No.942 - Liability of interest where CENVAT credit was wrongly taken but reversed by assessee before utilization  (Click here)

• RBI/ 2010-11/425 - Amendments to the Prevention of Money Laundering Rules, 2005  (Click here)

• RBI/2010-11/423 - Automation of non-MICR Clearing Houses – Implementation of a new Clearing Software –  Express Cheque Clearing System  (Click here)

• CO. LAW - Payment of MCA fees – Electronic Mode  (Click here)

• Companies Bill Faces Fresh Delay  (Click for detail)

• Notification No.31 - Quantity restriction of 720 million Kg on export of cotton yarn during 2010-11  (Click here)

• Public Notice No. 40 - Revision of fee for issuance of Certificate of Origin (Preferential) for India’s exports under FTAs and GSP schemes  (Click here)

• Draft Cos Bill Grants Govt. Power To Block Multiple-Layer Setups  (Click here)

• KYC Process Delay For MFs May Hit Investors Tax Plans  (Click here)

 

    "The trees that are slow to grow bear the best fruit" 

 

Thanks for your valuable time 

"Voice of CA"

CA. Sanjay Kumar Agarwal, Founder - Voice of CA
Member  Central Council - ICAI
Former Chairman - NIRC
Mob : 9811080342, agarwal.s.ca@gmail.com 
   
   
CA. Sidharth Jain, Co-Moderator
sidhjasso@yahoo.com 
  
CA. Mukesh K Bansal, Co-Moderator-FEMA
Mob:9540022533, mukbansal80@gmail.com