Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
19.07.2011 - Recent Updates as on 19.07.2011
Tuesday, July 19, 2011

 

I.  What's New of the day : 
  1. Service Tax Circular No. 144/13/2011 - Clarification on “Completion of service” under the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 and Service Tax Rules, 1994  (Click for detail)

  2. Co. Law - Amend in SCH. XIII of the Co. Act 1956  (Click for detail)

  3. Co. Law - Notification Amending Form No. 1A  (Click for detail)

  4. International Tax Review's Second Annual India Tax Forum 2011 will be held in Hotel Taj Mahal N.D. on Sept. 6-7, 2011-Free for In-House Executives  (Click for detail)

  5. RBI Circular No. 2 - Regularization of Liaison / Branch Offices of foreign entities established during the pre-FEMA period  (Click for detail)

  6. Residential Property is Capital Asset, it Attracts Tax on Purchase, Sale  (Click for detail)

      

    II.  Judicial Pronouncement 

1.  DHEERAJ CONSTRUCTION AND INDUSTRIES LTD Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ITA No. 218 of 2001, Dated : 1st July 2011, HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA

Whether when no incriminating document is found during the search, no addition can be made in respect of the transactions reflected in the regular books in the block assessment even if they are found to be fictitious and can only be considered under regular assessment

Held - Yes

Whether surcharge is applicable to the Income tax payable even though the search and seizure took place before insertion of the proviso to Section 113 of the Act. The proviso to Section 113 of the Act is curative in nature as is held by the Supreme Court, in the case of CIT vs. Suresh N. Gupta. Therefore, it is held that surcharge is applicable to the Income tax fixed under Section 113 of the Act even though the search and seizure took place before insertion of the proviso to Section 113 of the Act.

(Please click here for judgment)

 

2.  MRG DEVELOPERS (P) LTD Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITA No. 1642/Del/2009 Assessment Year: 2004-2005, Dated: 20th May 2011 ITAT – New Delhi

Whether when no information regarding the assessment records of alleged entry operators is considered by the AO due to non completion of assessment in those cases, the assessment is rightly set aside to the AO.

Most important information will come from the assessment records of alleged king pins of entry operators whose names have been mentioned in assessment order and ADI reports. There is no reference to any action taken on record. Since search & survey operations were made and systematic operations were going on, department must have proceeded against all of them and framed assessments. It is alleged by the department itself that they were operating with network of fictitious and brief case companies whose existence on paper was there but physical operations were managed and the capital was created by transfer of money from one account to other. Proper ascertainments of facts cannot be made in such type of cases unless the action taken in parallel king pin cases is referred to. AO was handicap when none of the person responded to the notice or summons and is found to be non-existent. AO and CIT(A) ought to have verified the record of parallel proceedings/ search proceedings in the case of kingpins of entry operators and their network entities, which has not been referred.

(Please click here for judgment)

 

"A Human Tongue takes 3 years to learn how to use it
but it takes Life time to learn when and where to use it!
"

  

Thanks for your valuable time

   

"Voice of CA"

  
CA. Sanjay Kumar Agarwal
Founder - Voice of CA 
Mob : 9811080342,
agarwal.s.ca@gmail.com      
   
CA. Sidharth Jain, Co-Moderator
sidhjasso@yahoo.com 
  
CA. Mukesh K Bansal, Co-Moderator-FEMA 
mukbansal80@gmail.com    

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now