Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
09.03.2013 - Voice of CA Presents - Updates
Saturday, March 9, 2013


 I.  Today's Headlines:

  1. Rate cut is now Reserve Bank of India's call: Chidambaram  (Click for detail)
  2. Sebi sets new norms for listing of preference shares  (Click for detail)
  3. I-T department busts hawala racket in Mumbai & Pune  (Click for detail)
  4. CA Rajesh murder case: High Court stays final verdict  (Click for detail)
  5. Govt banks start e-auction of property of loan defaulters  (Click for detail)
  6. Effective policies can fix inflation: D Subbarao  (Click for detail)
  7. India to grow at 7-8% in 3 yrs: PM  (Click for detail)
  8. Parliament nod sought for additional spending of Rs 49,715 cr  (Click for detail)
  9. World Bank bars L&T for six months over forgery by executive  (Click for detail)

II.  Useful Caselaws:

1.   E.I. Dupont India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. CIT, W.P.(C) 4507/2012, Date of Decision: 14.02.2013, High Court of Delhi

Failure to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment is a condition precedent for reopening of an assessment beyond the period of four years from the date of assessment.

Held:

“Since this was a case of proposed reopening of assessment after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year it was incumbent upon the assessing officer to demonstrate that there was failure on the part of the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary for its assessment. The purported reasons which we have extracted above do not even allege that there has been a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose any material fact. In fact, even in the impugned order dated 31.05.2012 there is no mention of what fact the assessee had failed to disclose which was necessary for the assessment in the original round of assessment. Failure to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment is a condition precedent for reopening of an assessment beyond the period of four years from the date of assessment. This is a pre-condition set out in the statute itself. It is ordered accordingly. All the proceedings pursuant to the notice dated 27.03.2012 are quashed. The writ petition is allowed”. 

(Please click here for judgment)


2.  Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., W.P. (C.) 711/2013, Judgment Delivered on: 08.02.2013, High Court of Delhi

The passing of an order dealing with the objections filed by the assessee is not an empty formality.

The assessing officer has to apply his mind to the objections raised by the assessee and use his grammatical sense while dealing with the objections of the assessee.  It should not be a cut-paste job like repetition of section 147 and 148 of the Income tax Act and extracts of quotations from Supreme Court and High Court decisions in the order.  Thus, the learned court has arrived at correct decision to set-aside the order and directs the assessing officer to provide an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

(Please click here for judgment)
    

 Golden Rules:

"Time is the most elastic element of world.
Because it increases when we are waiting
and decreases when we are enjoying"
 

 

  Thanks & Regards

Team

Voice of CA    

 

 


 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now