Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
08.02.2014 - Voice of CA presents - Updates
Saturday, February 8, 2014

  I. Today's Headlines:    


1. NOTIFICATION NO  9/2014-Customs (N.T.), Dated: February 06, 2014, specifying rate of exchange applicable from 07.02.2014. (Click here for details )
 
2. ICAI made important Amendments to Auditor’s Report Format.
Manner of Reporting on Section 227(3)(bb) of the Companies Act, 1956. (Click here for details) 
Reference to the Accounting Standards Applicable to the Companies In the Auditor’s Report and 
Limited Review Reports and various Engagement Standards.(Click here for detail)
    Amendment to the “Auditor’s Responsibility” Paragraph Included in the Independent Auditor’s Report.
(Click here for details) 
Use of the Term “Profit and Loss Account” or “Statement of Profit and Loss” in the Statutory Audit
 Reports of Companies. (Click here for details)
Manner of Reporting In Respect of Such Clauses of the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003
Which Are Not Applicable to the Auditee Company. (Click here for details)
 
 3. Domestic institutions to play key role in Axis Bank share sale. (Click here for details)

II.  Direct Tax Case laws:

1. DIT Vs. M/S E FUNDS IT SOLUTION, ITA No. 735/2011, Date of Order : 05.02.2014, High Court of Delhi.

Delhi High Court explains entire law on taxability of Permanent Establishment under DTAA, impact of Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) and computation of profits attributable to PE. 

(Please Click here to view Judgement)

 

2. Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Chandigarh v. Bazaar Decor (India) (P.) Ltd., IT APPEAL NO. 343 OF 2009 (O&M), DATE OF ORDER 19.09.2013

Free sample distribution expenses were allowable under section 37(1) even though there was no effective sale during year 

Wherever an expenditure is incurred by an assessee and it does not fall under any of the category which is not admissible, the expenditure would be allowed as a deduction while computing the income under the head 'Income from business or profession'. The aforesaid section nowhere provides that unless actual sales take palce, the deduction would not be admissible. It is intended to explore future sale of such commodities. Further, the provision nowhere envisages that the expenditure would be admissible only where such expenditure results in earning of income.

(Please Click here to view Judgement)

 

 Golden Rule:

  "Every team needs a hero, Every hero needs a team."

 

  Thanks & Regards

Team

Voice of CA 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now