Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
21.02.2014 - Voice of CA presents - Updates
Friday, February 21, 2014



  I. Today's Headlines:    


  1. Income Tax dept seizes Rs 300 crore cash from Uflex offices  (Click for detail)  
  2. Interest on loan for stocks not tax-deductible  (Click for detail)  
  3. PwC forensic audit finds diverse violations by MCX  (Click for detail)  
  4. Units of big firms likely to lose PF tax benefits  (Click for detail)  
  5. Sebi makes setting up whistle-blower mechanism mandatory for companies  (Click for detail)
  6. India will need to keep raising policy interest rate: IMF  (Click for detail)
  7. Inviting application for empanelment as examiner of Chartered Accountants Examinations  (Click for detail)

II.  Direct Tax Case laws:

1. ACIT vs Shri N. Prasad, ITA No. 1200/Hyd/2010, Date of Order: 27.01.2014, ITAT-Hyderabad

Whether the surplus receipt by the retiring partner is taxable in his hands as per provisions of section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Held_No

In the present case, the assessee had received a surplus of Rs. 25,00,000/- at the time of retirement from the partnership firm. The Ld. AO had made the additions on account of transfer of goodwill. The assessee was of the contention that goodwill is an asset of the firm and it cannot be transfer by the assessee, it continues to be held by the firm even after his retirement, so cannot be chargeable to tax. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the appeal in view of the facts of the case and by placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court pronounced in the case of R. Lingamallu Raghu Kumar in which it was held that the retirement of partner does not tantamount to transfer within the meaning of section 2(47) of the Act. The Hon’ble ITAT upheld the decision of CIT(A) and thus the appeal of revenue is dismissed. 

 

2. Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. vs ACIT, Appeal No. 777/2013, Date of Order: 21.10.2013, High court of Gujarat

Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in directing the AO to take fresh decision in accordance with the specific decision pronounced by special bench in another case.

Held No,
 
Under Section 254 of Income Tax Act 1961, the Tribunal has remanded the matter to the AO to take a fresh decision in light of decision pronounced by the Special Bench in case of IndusInd Bank Ltd. Vs ACIT. The Ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellant has taken a realistic and pragmatic view and clarified that the AO should take a fresh decision in accordance with law and the case law at time of deciding matter inclusive of aforesaid decision and Tribunal could not restrict to a particular decision only. The Hon’ble High Court by accepted the contention of assessee held that the fresh decision of the Ld. AO must be in accordance with law & on merit and not only on the basis of a specific decision.

 

 

 Golden Rule:

  "Hurt anyone with the weapon of truth
but never satisfy anyone by the power of lie
"

 

  Thanks & Regards

Team

Voice of CA 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now