Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
17.04.2014 - Voice of CA presents - Updates
Thursday, April 17, 2014

 I.  Today's Headlines   


  1. Decoding the New Companies Act  (Click for detail)
  2. EC asks CBDT to cancel tax benefits of defaulting political parties  (Click for detail)
  3. SC permits CAG to audit revenue receipts of telecom companies, may impact other sectors  (Click for detail)
  4. Stamp Act revamp to benefit treasury  (Click for detail)
  5. Circle rates for multi storey flats  (Click for detail)
  6. RBI for independent body to fix benchmark foreign exchange rate  (Click for detail)
  7. 10 important things to analyse in an Annual Report  (Click for detail)

II.  Direct Tax Case laws:

1.  Shree Vile Parle Vardhman Sthanakvasi Jain Foundation Vs. Director of Income Tax, ITA No. 7094 (MUM.) of 2012, Date of Order: 19.02.2014, ITAT-Mumbai

Where from records it was evident that main and generic objects of Trust was 'education', being a charitable activity for general public utility and where income and expenditure statement filed did not indicate spending of same for objects narrated by Director (Exemption), registration of Trust under section 12AA cannot be denied.

It was discussed in Samaria Charitable Trust v. DIT (Exemption) vide ITA No.7101 (M) of 2012 and another coordinate Bench decision in the case of M. Star Charitable Society v. CIT [2013] 142 ITD 153(Coch.) regarding the meaning of 'education' in the context of 'object of providing coaching classes'. Providing tutorial or coaching classes to the working students does not amount to commercial activity. 'Education' is a broad and generic term and the same should be understood in the context of the educational objects of the Trust.

(Please click here for judgment)

 

2.   Rasalika Trading & Investment Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, W.P.(C) NO. 1608 of 2013, Date of Decision: 14.02.2014 , High Court of Delhi

Held Yes

Where Assessing Officer completed original assessment of assessee for assessment year 2005-06 under section 143(3) on 24-12-2007 and subsequently notice for reassessment on basis of investigation report dated 13-3-2006 received from investigation wing, since reasons to believe did not state that investigation report was not with Assessing Officer when he completed original assessment. Whether attempt to reopen assessment was result of a change of opinion.

(Please click here for judgment)
 
 
 

 Golden Rules:

"Winners Never Do The Different Things...
They Do The Things Differently
"

 

  Thanks & Regards

Team

Voice of CA

 

 


 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now