Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
23.08.2019 - Voice of CA presents - Latest Updates
Friday, August 23, 2019

CA. {Member Name} 

  I. Headlines Today:   

  1. Revised tax appeal limits will apply to pending cases  (Click for detail)
  2. CBDT issues clarification on eligibility of small Start-ups to avail tax holiday  (Click for detail)
  3. Govt gives businesses four months to settle indirect tax disputes  (Click for detail)
  4. Capital gains: For FPIs, new SEBI norm is a tax-free ‘gift’  (Click for detail)
  5. Direct Tax Code | A transformative story for India’s taxation  (Click for detail)
  6. How freelancers can file their ITR for AY 2019-20  (Click for detail)

  II. Direct Taxes Case Law: 

1.   M/s. Neelkanth Plywood Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, I.T.A. No. 6702/Del/2018, Date of Order: 21.08.2019, ITAT – Delhi

Issue:
Whether AO is justified in reopening the case u/s 147 of the Act, on the basis of report of investigation wing without independent application of mind?

Held: No

Brief Facts:
The assessee is a company and filed its return of income and same is processed u/s 143(1). Subsequently the AO received information from Investigation Wing of the department that a search operation was carried out in the case of Sh. Surender Kumar Jain group of cases, who are known as entry operators. During the course of search and post search enquiries it was established that the said group is involved in providing accommodation entries to various persons whose names were named in the report. The name of the assessee company also appears in the said list as one of the beneficiaries. Thereafter the AO reopened the assessment u/s. 147 and notice u/s. 148 was issued to the assessee.

Held
Hon’ble ITAT held that “the reopening on the basis of report of investigation wing without independent application of mind by the Assessing Officer is not valid. Accordingly, the reassessment proceedings which were based on the report of the investigation wing and without independent application of mind by the Assessing Officer have been held to be illegal. Since the Assessing Officer in the instant case has reopened the assessment on the basis of report of the investigation wing and there appears to be no independent application of mind by the Assessing officer for reopening of the case, therefore, the reassessment proceeding initiated by the Assessing Officer are not proper. I, therefore, hold that the reassessment proceeding initiated by the Assessing Officer is illegal and accordingly the subsequent proceedings also become illegal and void”.

Hence, the appeal was held in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

(Please click here for judgment)

 

2.  Smt. Sunita Bhagchandka Vs. ACIT, I.T.A. No. 3447/Del/2016, Date of Order: 19.08.2019, ITAT – Delhi

Issue:
Whether AO is justified in assuming jurisdiction u/s 153C on the basis of documents unearthed during search, which does not indicate existence of any unaccounted income?

Held: No

Brief Facts:
The assessee is an individual earning income from house property and income from other sources. During a search & seizure on M2K group companies, a bank certificate issued by bank confirming the bank balance and credentials of the assessee found. Based on the impugned bank certificate Ld. AO recorded the satisfaction and assume jurisdiction u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Further Ld. AO made addition of shares received by assessee as gift from her sister-in-law.

Held
It is held that bank certificate seized during the search operation does not hold any information about undisclosed income of assessee. Apparently, that bank account clearly shows only the bank balance of that bank account. Further it is not the case where assessee does not disclosed such bank account in her Return of Income. Ld. AO does not produce any evidence which can prove that the bank certificate found during the search of third party is incrementing in the nature. Hon’ble ITAT held that “documents found during the course of search must give some indication about the undisclosed income of the assessee. The impugned certificate did not give any indication about the fact of gift of the shares, which are alleged to be undisclosed income of the assessee. In view of this, we do not have any hesitation in holding that the impugned bank certificate is not an incriminating document based on which the concluded assessment in the case of the assessee can be disturbed. In view of this according to us, we hold that no addition can be made in the hands of the assessee in absence of any incriminating evidence leading to any unaccounted income unearthed during the course of search”.

Hence, the appeal was held in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

(Please click here for judgment)
 
 

Golden Rules:

  "We cannot have all that we desire,
but time will give us all that we deserve" 

                                       
 

Thanks & Regards

  Team

Voice of CA 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now