II. Useful Case Laws:
1. Vodafone West Ltd. Vs. ACIT, S.A. No. 86/Ahd/2012, Date of Pronouncement: 11.01.2013, ITAT - Ahmadabad
Sec. 254(2A) Third Proviso: Tribunal has the power to grant unlimited stay of demand
The assessee
is seeking extension of stay beyond 365 days. The assessee argued that
on similar facts the matter is pending before the Supreme Court in case
of Idea Cellular Ltd and Bharti Cellular Ltd wherein ad interim order
had been passed. In CIT vs. Ronuk Industries Ltd 333 ITR 99 (Bom) &
Tata Communications Ltd 138 TTJ 257 (Mum) (SB) it has been held that the
Tribunal has power to extend the period of stay beyond 365 days under
the Third Proviso to sec. 254(2A) even if the delay in disposing off the
appeal is not attributable to the assessee as there may be several
other reasons for not disposing of the appeal by the ITAT. In Qualcomm
Incorporated (ITAT Del) (ITA No. 3696 to 3702/Del/2009) it was held that
as there was a cleavage of opinion between the Bombay High Court and
the Karnataka High Court and there was no decision of the jurisdictional
High Court on the issue, the view favourable to the assessee has to be
adopted. Consequently, the stay has to be extended subject to certain
conditions.
(Please click here for judgment)
2. ACIT Vs. Al Hind Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd., I.T.A Nos. 373-376/Coch/2011, Date of order: 14.12.2012, ITAT - Cochin
Discount
given to small time agents, retail customers & group passengers for
purchase of tickets by an IATA agent is not liable to TDS under section
194H.
It cannot be
said that these small time travel agents are providing any service to
the assessee herein either by acting on its behalf or during the course
of sale of flight tickets. On the contrary, they act on behalf of the
travelling public or their respective customers. Thus, they provide
service only to their customers by identifying the best available rates
for the flight tickets ordered by their respective customers.
Accordingly, in our view, the commission income ceded by the assessee
herein in respect of the tickets psurchased by the small time travel
agents on behalf of their respective customers, would partake the
character of “Discount” only. Accordingly, in our view, such discount
payments will not be attracted by the provisions of sec. 194H of the
Act.
(Please click here for judgment)
|