Connect us       New User?     Subscribe Now
Confirm your Email ID for Updates
09.09.2013 - Voice of CA Presents - Updates
Monday, September 9, 2013



 I.  Today's Headlines   


  1. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on e-filing of Tax Audit Report  (Click for detail)
  2. Last date of filing of Annexure 2C & 2D online extended upto 07.10.2013  (Click for detail)   
  3. Draft Rules Companies Act, 2013  (Click for detail)
  4. DVAT: Form DP-1 shall be submitted online by all the dealers latest by 16.10.2013  (Click for detail)
  5. Rs 1.27 lakh crore indirect tax revenue stuck in litigations  (Click for detail)
  6. Personal details cannot be disclosed under RTI: Bombay High Court  (Click for detail)
  7. RBI allows foreign promoters to raise stake in domestic companies  (Click for detail)

II.  Direct Tax Case laws:

1.  ITO Vs. On Exim Pvt. Ltd., ITA No. 1116/Del/2011 Date of Decision: 27.08.2013, ITAT - Delhi

Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961

Whether notice issued u/s 148 with in specified time but handed over to the postal authorities after that period on wrong address is constitute a valid notice.

Held: No

The assessment under Section 148 read with Section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was reopened on the basis of information received from Investigation Wing and the notice was on wrong address.

The hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court held in the case of Kanubhai M.Patel (HUF) Vs. Hiren Bhatt or His Successors to Office and Others that the date of issue would be the date on which the same were handed over for service to the proper officer and referring to the same hon’ble tribunal held that the notice was handed over to the postal authorities on 1st April, 2008 which was beyond the period of limitation of six years provided in Section 149. Moreover, the same cannot be said to be valid issue of notice when it is wrongly addressed. Therefore, the notice issued u/s 148 was not valid and the same is quashed.

(Please click here for judgment)


2.  Smt. Deepa Gupta Vs. CIT, ITA No. 2803 & 5274/Del/2011 Date of Decision: 23.08.2013, ITAT-Delhi

Whether the Ld. CIT was justified in setting aside the case without affording a reasonable opportunity to the Assessee to controvert the issues raised by the Ld. AO which were considered erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue?

Held: No

In the instant case, additions by the CIT were made (ex-parte order) without providing a proper opportunity of being heard by considering them as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. Right to be heard is an important right to which a party who is faced with an adverse view is entitled to “Audi alteram partem”  being one of the most famous and celebrated Rule of Natural Justice. The Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal after considering the facts of the case, held that audi alteram partem cannot be sacrificed at the altar of the administrative convenience or celebrity, decided in favor of the assessee.

(Please click here for judgment)

 

 Golden Rules:

"A simple rule for success,
"Just try one more time in a different way
before you decide to quit""

 

  Thanks & Regards

Team

Voice of CA

 

 


 

« Back
 
Online Poll
Connect Us       New User?     Subscribe Now