1. CIT Vs. Fr Mullers Charitable Institutions, ITA No. 588/2007, Date of decision: 10/02/2014, High Court of Karnataka
Section 11 and 13 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Whether
violation of Section 11(5) r/w Section 13(1)(d) by the Trust attracts
maximum marginal rate of tax on the entire income of the Trust.
Held _No
In the instant
case, the assessee-Trust claimed exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The
commissioner by exercising his suo-motu power u/s 263 held that in view
of Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, total income of the Trust has to be
assessed for the tax in view of the said violation. The Hon’ble high
court has placed reliance on the judgment of Delhi High Court in the
case of Director of Income Tax (E) vs Agrim Charan Foundation (2002) 253
ITR 593 and Bombay High Court in the case of Director of Income Tax
(E) vs Sheth Mafatlal Gagalbhai Foundation Trust (2001) 249 ITR 533
and held that reading of the proviso to Section 142 is very clear that
the legislature has clearly contemplated that in a case, where the whole
or part of the relevant income is not exempted u/s 11 by virtue of
violation of Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, tax shall be levied on the
relevant income or a part of the relevant income at the maximum marginal
rate.
(Please click here for judgment)
2. Ahinsa Education and Health Trust Vs. DIT (E), ITA No. 1408/Hyd/2013, Date of pronouncement: 20/02/2014, ITAT-Hyderabad
Section 12A/ 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Whether
registration under Hindu Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1987
or/and other competent authority of Government is mandatory for
obtaining registration of trust u/s 12A of the I. Tax Act, 1961.
Held _No
In brief, the
assessee is a public trust created by virtue of a registered trust deed
and applied for registration u/s 12A of the Act. While granting
registration u/s 12AA of the Act, the DIT (E) directed the Trust to
obtain the registration from the competent authority of Government of
Andhra Pradesh u/s 43 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu
Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 and submit the same
within a period of six month. The hon’ble Tribunal has held that when
the provisions contained u/s 12A r.w. sec. 12AA of the Act do not
mandate obtaining of such registration as a condition precedent for
registration u/s 12A, the DIT (E) cannot insist upon such registration.
(Please click here for judgment)