II. Direct Taxes Case Laws:
1. Mahesh Kumar Gupta Vs. CIT (A), I.T.A .No. 1347/DEL/2014, Date of Judgment: 08 .06.2016, ITAT - New Delhi
Issue:
Whether the CIT can direct the examination of taxability of the
deemed dividend u/s 2(22) (e) of the Act by passing order under Section
263 in the proceedings u/s 153A, when no such related material was found
during search proceeding?
Held – No
Brief facts
Assessee was a director in the Company Jackson Generators (P) Ltd.
holding substantial shareholding of more than 43.19%. The company is
engaged in the manufacture and sale of Gen Sets. He is also a partner in
the firm M/s. Jackson & Co. having 33% share of profit and this
firm is also engaged in the manufacturing and sale of Gen Sets and
trading in Motors, Engines etc.
In the
above case, the CIT observed that M/s Jakson & Co. has taken loan of
Rs.1,72,15,824/- from M/s Jakson Generators Pvt. Ltd. - which ought to
be fixed as deemed dividend u/s 2(22) (e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in
the hands of the assessee-as this transfer of loan attracts the
provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. The above amount was not
considered for taxation at the time of assessment proceedings u/s 143(3)
r.w.s 153A of the Act, the assessment order for the A.Y 2004-05 is
found to be erroneous in so far, as prejudicial to the interest of
revenue, the Assessing Officer has made an omission of ignoring the
provisions of deemed dividend. Hence, the CIT issued notice u/s 263 of
the I.T. Act, 1961 to the assessee.
The CIT
held that the order passed by the Ld. AO is erroneous in so far as it is
prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Thus, CIT directed the AO
to examine the taxability of the amount of Rs. 1,72,15,824/- in the
hands of the assessee u/s 2(22)(e) of the I. T. Act, 1961. Thereafter,
the aggrieved assessee appealed before the Hon’ble ITAT.
Held
The Hon’ble ITAT held that the issue of deemed dividend does not
arise from the provisions of Section 153A of the Act and there is no
seized material unearthed at the relevant time. Thus it is beyond
Assessing Officer’s power to address the said issue in proceedings
initiated u/s 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act. The CIT was
wrong in directing the examination of taxability of deemed dividend
under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act, in the proceedings u/s 153A of the
Act while passing order under Section 263 of the Act when the
proceedings under Section 153A itself has not unearthed the said issue.
Thus, the CIT does not have power u/s 263 of the Act to give its own
opinion when there is no new material unearthed. The issue taken up by
the CIT was not within the purview of the Assessing Officer at the
inception of assessment proceedings. Hence, Appeal of the Assessee is
allowed.
(Please click here for judgment)
2. Shri
Shirdi Sai Darbar Charitable Trust (Dharamshala) Vs. CIT(Exemptions),
I.T.A. No. 692/CHD/2015, Date of Pronouncement: 08.06.2016, ITAT -
Chandigarh
Issue:
Whether CIT (Exemptions) can reject the application for
registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act,1961 on the grounds that the
assessee has not filed any ITR and the clause of memorandum provide
absolute powers to the trustees to manage the property of the trust
which may attract the provision of Section 13(1)(c) of the Act?
HELD: No
Brief Facts:
The assessee is a charitable trust filed an application for
registration u/s 12A before the CIT(exemption),Chandigarh. After
providing the opportunity of being heard the CIT(exemptions) have denied
the application on the ground that the assessee has not filed any ITR
yet and the clause of memorandum provide absolute powers to the trustees
to manage the property of the trust which may attract the provision of
Section 13(1)(c) of the Act.
Held:
Hon’ble ITAT held that the condition which CIT(Exemptions) has to
satisfy while granting the registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax
Act,1961 are that the objects of the assessee are charitable in nature
and the activities are genuine. There are no adverse remarks made by the
CIT (Exemptions) with regard to objects of memorandum. Since the
assessee has not filed its ITR it cannot be said the activities are not
genuine. Moreover, section 13 comes into play at the time of granting
exemption u/s 11 and not for granting exemption u/s 12A of the Act.
Hence the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
(Please click here for judgment)
|