III. Direct Taxes Case Laws:
1. CIT Vs. Anil Arora, I.T.A. No. 340/2015 & C.M. No. 9241/2015, Date of Order: 22.05.2015, High Court of Delhi
Whether
reference to DVO for estimation of market value of property is
justifiable where no corresponding documents found during search which
may remotely reflect that consideration was over and above to what was
shown to be paid in the registered sale deed
Held No
It is
fairly conceded (at bar) by the counsel for the Revenue that the
reference to DVO for estimation of the market value of the property in
Punjabi Bagh was not based on any material discovered or seized during
the search operations. The counsel, however, referred to the case of
another property in District Baddi (Himachal Pradesh), in respect of
which documentary evidence indicated unaccounted consideration paid by
the assessee. At the same time, learned counsel also conceded that no
addition to the tax liability of the assessee on account of the said
other property has been made. There is no nexus between the property in
Baddi (Himachal Pradesh) and the property in Punjabi Bagh (West). There
is undoubtedly no material available to even remotely reflect that
consideration over and above what was shown to be paid in the registered
sale deed of the West Punjabi Bagh property was made over to the
seller. In these circumstances, it was not fair in the first place to
refer the said property for estimation of its market value by DVO. The
assessment of the value by DVO cannot hold primacy over the
consideration for which the property was actually acquired.
(Please click here to for judgment)
2. CIT Vs. Shyam Biri Works, I.T.A. No. 172 of 2004, Date of Order: 06.05.205, Agra high Court
Monetary
limits for filing revenues appeals as per the latest instructions u/s
268A shall apply not only to prospective appeals but also to pending
appeals.
The CBDT
while issuing Instruction No.3 of 2011 had not kept in mind the object
and intention sought to be achieved by the National Litigation Policy
and, in order to bring harmony with the National Litigation Policy, the
Instruction No.3 of 2011 would also apply to pending appeals in various
Courts or Tribunals unless it is pointed out by the department that the
appeal would have a cascading effect in other assessment years of the
assessee or that it is within the exception provided in the instructions
that was issued at the time when the appeal was presented.
(Please click here to for judgment)
|